Azure Hybrid Data Improvements
Removes unnecessary placeholder objects Only creates relationships when both sides exist Reduces graph churn and improves analysis time
658 articles
Removes unnecessary placeholder objects Only creates relationships when both sides exist Reduces graph churn and improves analysis time
Attack path management has historically focused on identity systems like Active Directory and Entra ID. That focus made sense. These systems define authentication, authorization, and privilege at scale, and they remain central to how access is granted across an environment. But they are not the full picture. There are entire classes of systems that introduce attack paths that do not exist in the directory. Device management platforms are one of the most important examples. These systems are resp
Perhaps the most important aspect of modeling Jamf is what happens when these capabilities intersect with other platforms. In real environments, attackers rarely operate within a single system. They move between identity providers, device management platforms, and other services as they progress toward their objective. This creates hybrid attack paths spanning multiple systems. We can then identify a path from a non-privileged Active Directory User to one of the jamf_Account nodes that had execu
BadWindowService is chock-full of vulnerabilities and includes a lot of text in the README and logged messages, making it clear that this is intentionally vulnerable. Despite removing those, the response to the following system prompt and prompt was Claude’s conclusion that this is intentionally vulnerable due to the sheer volume of security controls circumvented. It did present its findings in a nice table for further investigation. # Application Information### DescriptionThis is the source cod
Identity is no longer confined to a single system. In modern environments, identity spans multiple platforms: Active Directory, Okta, Entra, GitHub, and others; each operating within its own environment, with its own model for authentication and access. These systems are connected through federation, synchronization, and single sign-on. Each connection serves a legitimate purpose, enabling organizations to manage identity centrally while extending access across platforms. But these connections a
In practice, these relationships rarely present themselves as a single, obvious chain. They are distributed across platforms, environments, and teams, each with its own perspective on identity and access. Consider a typical scenario. An organization uses Active Directory as an upstream identity source, federated into an Okta environment. That Okta environment is then used to provide single sign-on into a set of downstream applications. In some cases, those relationships extend further, to additi
One thing that comes as a surprise is that native Okta attack paths are relatively short when compared to our security models of Active Directory (AD) and Microsoft Entra ID. There are multiple reasons for this: Okta does not support group nesting and only users can be members of groups Many theoretical privilege elevation paths are intentionally mitigated by only allowing Super Administrators (the most privileged role in Okta) to modify users, groups, and applications that have role assignme
Workflows in Okta provide a robust way to automate tasks related to user provisioning and deprovisioning. To achieve this, Okta must be granted non-trivial permissions in connected systems. Here is an example of permissions needed by the Microsoft Office 365 connector: Figure 17. Example Okta Workflows connector permissions. Anyone in control of the workflow could perform administrative actions in Microsoft Entra. As there is no documented API for reading the information about existing workflows
Okta’s Active Directory agents can be installed on member servers to provide synchronization of AD users and groups to/from Okta. This capability is thus similar to Microsoft’s Entra Connect. Unlike Microsoft, Okta recommends for the synchronization service accounts to be added to the Domain Admins group in AD, granting Okta administrators unlimited control over Active Directory. As managed service accounts are not supported by Okta, a human must set and manually rotate service account passwords
La proposition n°5 est sobrement intitulée « Objectif zéro Microsoft dans les écoles ». Elle est accompagnée d’une modification du code de l’éducation pour intégrer l’enseignement des logiciels libres ; le rapport pointant l’ancrage précoce des habitudes numériques chez les élèves comme un facteur clé de la dépendance de long terme.
The cybersecurity community has the opportunity to serve as the voice of reason: the best response is proactive, disciplined preparation, not panic. While access to the publicly known, most capable frontier models is currently restricted to responsible actors, the availability of these technologies to a broader audience is inevitable. For defenders, this signals a surge in vulnerability management demands. The traditional window between a vulnerability’s disclosure and its active exploitation in
Secure company data by trusting the device, not just the sign-in 1Password Device Trust lets organisations restrict access based on the health of a user’s device. This way, compromised, unmanaged, or out-of-date endpoints don’t get a free pass to sensitive tools and data. Now, with EU data hosting, EMEA teams can adopt that control without compromising on data residency requirements. A smoother rollout that supports employees When employees get blocked and don’t understand why, they do what huma
The impact of this attack by North Korea-nexus actors is broad and has ripple effects as other popular packages rely on axios as a dependency. Notably, UNC1069 isn’t the only threat actor that has launched successful open source supply chain attacks in recent weeks. UNC6780 (also known as TeamPCP) recently poisoned GitHub Actions and PyPI packages associated with projects like Trivy, Checkmarx, and LiteLLM to deploy the SANDCLOCK credential stealer and facilitate follow-on extortion operations.
In this test, Claude Sonnet 4 was asked to open a shared document from a colleague. It found an email with a “Q1 Project Timeline” link, clicked it, saw a Microsoft 365 login form, looked up the user’s real password in the vault, typed it in, and hit submit. When the page didn’t load, it tried again. Here, the model fell into the same trap that many people do in phishing attacks: it failed to examine the web address. The link pointed to acmecorp-sharepoint.com-docs.cloud, a domain designed to lo
Microsoft Defender XDR customers can refer to the list of applicable detections below. Microsoft Defender XDR coordinates detection, prevention, investigation, and response across endpoints, identities, email, and apps to provide integrated protection against attacks like the threat discussed in this blog. TacticObserved activityMicrosoft Defender coverageInitial access / ExecutionCompromised packages published though GitHub Actions OIDC trusted publishingMicrosoft Defender Antivirus – Trojan:Sc
Security Copilot customers can use the standalone experience to create their own prompts or run prebuilt promptbooks to automate investigation and response tasks related to this threat. Useful promptbooks for this activity include Incident investigation, Microsoft User analysis, Threat actor profile, Threat Intelligence 360 report based on MDTI intelligence, and Vulnerability impact assessment. Some promptbooks require access to Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Sentinel, or related Microsoft se
While this new expert-delivered service helps customers turn threat intelligence into action through direct engagement with Microsoft analysts, we’re also continuing to bring that same type of insight closer to defenders’ day-to-day workflows. Today we’re announcing that Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence (MDTI) capabilities are now fully converged into the Defender portal. Intelligence is available real-time across detection, investigation, response, hunting, and automation, reducing contex
A quarterly report sharing insights from 400+ companies integrating AI into daily engineering work.
Supports ADFS with Integrated Windows Authentication (IWA) Aligns with Windows-native enterprise auth workflows
Removes unnecessary placeholder objects Only creates relationships when both sides exist Reduces graph churn and improves analysis time
Attack path management has historically focused on identity systems like Active Directory and Entra ID. That focus made sense. These systems define authentication, authorization, and privilege at scale, and they remain central to how access is granted across an environment. But they are not the full picture. There are entire classes of systems that introduce attack paths that do not exist in the directory. Device management platforms are one of the most important examples. These systems are resp
Perhaps the most important aspect of modeling Jamf is what happens when these capabilities intersect with other platforms. In real environments, attackers rarely operate within a single system. They move between identity providers, device management platforms, and other services as they progress toward their objective. This creates hybrid attack paths spanning multiple systems. We can then identify a path from a non-privileged Active Directory User to one of the jamf_Account nodes that had execu
BadWindowService is chock-full of vulnerabilities and includes a lot of text in the README and logged messages, making it clear that this is intentionally vulnerable. Despite removing those, the response to the following system prompt and prompt was Claude’s conclusion that this is intentionally vulnerable due to the sheer volume of security controls circumvented. It did present its findings in a nice table for further investigation. # Application Information### DescriptionThis is the source cod