Synthèse
The market has moved from interest in Identity APM to the harder work of building it into practice. Organizations are not asking whether to invest in this. They are asking how to operationalize what they’ve built. The survey shows 39% of organizations now evaluate attack paths continuously. It shows 65% use risk-based prioritization. It also shows 41% still struggle to effectively act on their findings. That gap between what the tools can surface and what the organization can do about it is the
The market has moved from interest in Identity APM to the harder work of building it into practice. Organizations are not asking whether to invest in this. They are asking how to operationalize what they’ve built. The survey shows 39% of organizations now evaluate attack paths continuously. It shows 65% use risk-based prioritization.
It also shows 41% still struggle to effectively act on their findings. That gap between what the tools can surface and what the organization can do about it is the gap that needs closing, and that requires a durable practice around the visibility they already have. The organizations that gain the most from Identity APM will not be the ones with the most comprehensive deployments. They will be the ones that built a function around those deployments: clear ownership, cross-functional coordination, and a remediation workflow that can keep pace. That is what operational maturity means in this context.
Not the tools, but the function. Read the full “Trends in Identity Attack Path Management 2026” report. The post Identity APM Has Gone Mainstream. The Hard Work Is Just Starting. appeared first on SpecterOps.
Source originale
specterops.io
CORTEX